In recent decades, it has become a regular practice for UN officials to make intrusive inspections to look for evidence that states are developing nuclear weapons. It was not always so. The nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) does not authorize such mandatory inspections. Nor does the NPT authorize the UN Security Council to impose sanctions when a government refuses to submit to inspections. These rules were improvised in the early 1990s, and since then, they have been applied selectively against adversaries of the US such as Iraq, Iran and North Korea. This article was first published in Socialist Worker on January 17, 2003.

Inspectors_CyprusMANY PEOPLE who oppose Bush’s war drive against Iraq nevertheless believe that the United Nations (UN) should have the right to send weapons inspectors to snoop around. Supposedly, the inspectors are legitimate because they are “independent” of the U.S. and other UN member states.

But the opposite is true — and the record of the UN’s chief weapons inspector Hans Blix shows why. Blix spent much of the 1990s building a tight connection between the UN weapons inspectors and U.S. spy agencies and military labs.

As director general of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the early 1990s, Blix was the first to use CIA data in North Korea. “Despite the misgivings of third-world members of the IAEA board, Blix, a former Swedish foreign minister, established the right to accept intelligence information supplied by the United States and other member states in its investigations,” wrote former Washington Post reporter Don Oberdorfer in his 1997 book The Two Koreas.

The U.S. government, then under George Bush Sr., was only too happy to feed data to Blix. “Taking no chances that the IAEA chief would miss something of importance, U.S. officials provided intelligence briefings for Blix and his top aides in September 1991, March 1992, and on May 7, immediately before his departure” to launch inspections at the North Korean nuclear complex at Yongbyon, writes Oberdorfer.

When Blix acquired nuclear samples from Yongbyon, he sent them to Patrick Air Force Base in Florida for analysis. But in 1994, the Clinton administration reached an agreement with North Korea to de-escalate a crisis in relations, the U.S. itself called a halt to aggressive IAEA inspections–the very inspections that are supposed to take place “independently” of the whims of UN member states.

Still, Blix is responsible for effectively rewriting the way that arms inspections took place. Before 1991, writes Oberdorfer, “the IAEA limited itself to checking civilian nuclear facilities and materials that Nonproliferation Treaty signatories reported in voluntary declarations.”

But following the Gulf War, when the Bush Sr. and Clinton administrations wanted to apply extra pressure to Iraq and North Korea, Blix invented “special inspections” — mandatory searches backed up by the threat of UN Security Council sanctions.

In this way, the UN inspectorate became an ever-harsher tool in the hands of nuclear-armed Security Council members whenever they want to punish weaker states for trying to acquire equally destructive weapons.

2 thoughts on “How UN inspectors became Washington’s tools

  1. Pingback: North Korea faces the fury of US empire | Works in theory

  2. Pingback: Three myths about militarism in Korea | Works in theory

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s